![]() ![]() Unfortunately it is impossible to distinguish between the different parts of an orgs webservers. The developers themselves have been reluctant to comment on the STEAM and BF2 issues and the fact that this software breaks them. The desire to play legitimate games far exceeds that of software piracy. The fact that this program breaks Battlefield 2 and Steam VAC connectivity is a huge concern considering its audience, doubly so because it gives no indication to its gaming audience that it will purposefully break such applications. JFM 14:00, 8 September 2005 (UTC) Reply You're involvement in the project itself is skewing your positioning of this article. That is neutral (I think), while this is, while an issue people discover, not an actual problem with the application. I'm trying incredibly hard to keep this article accurate and comprehensive, and I am actually setting out the largest section of the article to the analysis of criticism of it. If you wish to hear exactly the same argument again you can post on the forums about it. In the persuit of fact I have reverted your entry, and I think have justified myself from the evidence above. This application is not simplistic, it's built from several elements and has often been hyped by non-savvy media orgs - there are misconceptions about the application, this being one of them. This means when you connect to counter-strike, etc you can just switch to pg, right click on the Valve IPs and choose to allow them. As I also say in the article, any IP address can be allowed by right clicking on it and choosing to allow the IP. The reasons behind Valve's addition to the blocklist follows a number of occasions where the organisation posted fake BitTorrent downloads." to back this up see the BBC article at It is not valid to make criticisms without full understanding. For example, a lot of ranges owned by Valve Software are blocked, meaning that some users must allow these IP addresses in order to connect to game servers. This is sometimes a case of over-zealous or incorrect moderation at, but can also be for other reasons. I say: "Occasionally IP addresses of "friendly" organisations and groups may be added to the blocklist. I comment on this issue in the section about the Lists in criticism. ![]() While I'm not impartial here, from npov this is an invalid criticism since this is what PG is DESIGNED to do. The servers of games companies are blanket blocked to avoid issues related to DRM and numerous anti-piracy measures from these companies. See proof in bug list here: This is neither a bug nor an issue. I await to see either an apology or some proof of what you have claimed.Updating with information regarding BF2 and HL:Source games not working with PeerGuardian 2. ![]() I ask you now to back up your claim that we asked anyone to open a browser window at any time on our front page, this is a serious claim of potentially criminal activity and if your unable to support the claim I will then ban you from the site again, its morally wrong to make claims based on your desire to win an arguement at any cost, if you have proof of such activity then I shall resign as I have never asked anyone to do such things on this site and honour would demand I stepped down. It seems obvious that I,m wasting my time here with a clueless chap who cant understand that the "antip2p" range was simply on their list because it was used by a company blutak dont like at some stage in history and not because it had attacked anything or done anything else.Īlso your claims against both the the peer cache operator, King macro and ourselves are pure speculation based on fresh air as the log shows, when asked for some evidence of an attack none was forthcoming, you have to ask if they cant show any logs for their own site why should anyone trust any of their other claims as regards IPs to be blocked. Is there any claim you wont make Blitzen ?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |